Skip to content

Evaluation of different fiberotomy methods on relapse of rotated teeth after orthodontic treatment

Evaluation of conventional supracrestal fiberotomy and Erbium laser aided fiberotomy on relapse of rotated lower incisors compared to no fiberotomy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT201604249085N5
Enrollment
75
Registered
2016-05-29
Start date
2015-05-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

rotation of teeth. Anomalies of tooth position

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention 1 : Conventional fiberotomy : After local anesthesia by injection of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1.100000 fiberotomy is done around the tooth to the alveolar socket by
Treatment - Surgery
Intervention 1 : Conventional fiberotomy : After local anesthesia by injection of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1.100000 fiberotomy is done around the tooth to the alveolar socket by inserting the t
Intervention 2 : Erbium laser aided fiberotomy : After local anesthesia by injection of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1.100000 fiberotomy is done around the tooth to the alveolar socket by inserting
Intervention 3 : Control : No type of fiberotomy is done really

Sponsors

vice chancellor for research and technology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
12 Years to 20 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria : Patients undergone orthodontic treatment who are 12-20 years old at the start of treatment and they are in finishing phase of active treatment with at least one rotated mandibular incisor before treatment ; Degree of rotation should be 20 to 70 degrees. Exclusion criteria : Patients with systemic diseases such as diabetes ; Patients with periodontal disease ; Patients with uncontrolled gingival inflammation (edema, bleeding on probing) ; Patients using osteoclast inhibitor medications ; Teeth with deep proximal caries extended to cemento enamel junction (CEJ) ; Teeth with developmental and anatomical malformations ; Teeth that were stripped during treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Relapse. Timepoint: Two months after the intervention. Method of measurement: By measuring on the digitized dental models in degrees.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Dental clinic crown height in the facial surface. Timepoint: At the time of intervention , 2 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Using a caliper in millimeter.;Probing depth around the tooth. Timepoint: At the time of intervention , 2 months after the intervention. Method of measurement: using a periodontal probe in millimeter.;Pain. Timepoint: 24 hours after intervention. Method of measurement: to answer the McGill Pain Questionnaire.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAmirfarhang Miresmaeili

Hamadan University of Medical Sciences

miresmaeili@umsha.ac.ir+98 81 3823 9064

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026