the effect of using piezosurgery for implant placement on post operative pain, implant stability and bone loss of implants during a 5 moths period

Comparing the effect of preparing implant site with piezosurgery and conventional drilling on patient’s post-operative pain and its effect on stability and bone loss around implants after 5 month period follow up

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT2016041524622N3

Enrollment

Registered

2016-04-30

Start date

2016-04-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Implant treatment. Loss of teeth due to accident, extraction or local periodontal disease

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: Osteotomy site is prepared using conventional drilling. Intervention 2: Intervention group: Implant osteotomy site is prepared using piezosurgery.

Treatment - Surgery

Treatment - Drugs

Control group: Osteotomy site is prepared using conventional drilling

Intervention group: Implant osteotomy site is prepared using piezosurgery

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: patients candidate for implant placement in two lateral quadrants; implant placement should be at least 6 months after tooth extraction; No GBR(Guided bone regeneration) needed around implants; patients with no systemic disease; non smoker patients; No antibiotics or drugs should be taken during the last two months Exclusion Criteria: implants placed in the same sextant; implants placed in different bone densities; patients with systemic disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pain. Timepoint: first day after surgery. Method of measurement: using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).;Implant stability. Timepoint: Surgery day. Method of measurement: using a Osstell Mentor device.;Marginal bone loss. Timepoint: Surgery day. Method of measurement: Periapical radiography.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Pain. Timepoint: day 3 after the surgery. Method of measurement: using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).;Pain. Timepoint: day 10 after the surgery. Method of measurement: using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).;Implant Stability. Timepoint: Day 90 after the surgery. Method of measurement: Using Osstell Mentor device.;Implant Stability. Timepoint: Day 150 after the surgery. Method of measurement: Using Osstell Mentor device.;Marginal bone loss. Timepoint: 5 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Periapical radiography.	—

Measure

Time frame

Pain. Timepoint: day 3 after the surgery. Method of measurement: using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).;Pain. Timepoint: day 10 after the surgery. Method of measurement: using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).;Implant Stability. Timepoint: Day 90 after the surgery. Method of measurement: Using Osstell Mentor device.;Implant Stability. Timepoint: Day 150 after the surgery. Method of measurement: Using Osstell Mentor device.;Marginal bone loss. Timepoint: 5 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Periapical radiography.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactEhsan Hooshyar

Hamedan University of Medical Sciences

skafilzadeh@yahoo.com+98 81 3824 7464

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026