FindTrial
Sign In

A Comparison two methods of dental anesthesia with different anesthetic in extraction of primary dentition

A Comparison between Articaine Mandibular Infiltration and Lidocaine Mandibular Block Anaesthesia in Second Primary Molar

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2016040927300N1
Enrollment
42
Registered
2016-06-27
Start date
2015-09-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

local anesthesia. Local anaesthetics

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: Use the techniques and injected lidocaine block. Intervention 2: 2 intervention groups: injection of anesthetic solution infiltration and Articaine.
Treatment - Other
Intervention group 1: Use the techniques and injected lidocaine block
2 intervention groups: injection of anesthetic solution infiltration and Articaine

Sponsors

Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
88 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria:Public health healthy or with Mild systemic disease; Lack of sensitivity to local anesthetics; Lack of medication in the past 24 hours; Acute abscess of the tooth and does not wobble. Exclusion criteria: More than 11 years younger than 8 years; Lack of cooperation, Anesthesia allergy on drug use

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The success of local anesthesia. Timepoint: 72 hours. Method of measurement: SEM.—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactElham Ghaffari

Islamic Azad University of Isfahan (Khorasgan), Dental School

elhamghafarri2154@yahoo.come.ghaffari@khuisf.ac.ir+98 31 3230 1518

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026