Skip to content

Comparison treatment outcomes use of two classic and preperitoneal surgery methods in inguinal hernia repair

Comparison of treatment outcomes of surgical repair in inguinal hernia with classic versus preperitoneal methods on patient satisfaction and reduction of postoperative complications

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2016030826974N1
Enrollment
150
Registered
2016-06-07
Start date
2015-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

inguinal herniorrhphy. Hernia with both gangrene and obstruction is classified to hernia with gangrene

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group 1: candidate patients for inguinal henniorrhaphy with pre-peritoneal method. In this method, mesh is inserted on the peritoneum layer. Intervention 2: Intervention g
Treatment - Surgery
Intervention group 1: candidate patients for inguinal henniorrhaphy with pre-peritoneal method. In this method, mesh is inserted on the peritoneum layer
Intervention group 2: candidate patients for inguinal henniorrhaphy with classic method. This method is a free tension procedure to repair which employs artificial materials (mesh) to construct the fl

Sponsors

Vice Chancellor for research of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: having inguinal hernia, candidate for classic herniorrhaphy, candidate for preperitoneal herniorrhaphy, satisfaction to enter to study. Exclusion criteria: diabetes, bleeding disorders, aspirin and corticosteroid consumption.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: Before intervention and two months after intervention. Method of measurement: questionnaire.;Duration of operation. Timepoint: after intervention. Method of measurement: Clock-Patient case.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Recurrence. Timepoint: 3, 4, 5, 6 and 12 months after intervention. Method of measurement: questionnaire.;Hematoma. Timepoint: 3, 4, 5 and 6 months after intervention. Method of measurement: questionnaire.;Seroma. Timepoint: 3, 4, 5 and 6 months after intervention. Method of measurement: questionnaire.;Patient satisfaction rate. Timepoint: 6 months after intervention. Method of measurement: questionnaire.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr.Hormoz Mahmoudvand

Lorestan University of Medical Sciences

shahabforutani@gmail.com+98 66 3323 6401

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026