Skip to content

Comparing the effectiveness of a pediatric airway management training program delivered through two methods of a role-playing simulation and an escape room-based serious game on knowledge and performance of students at Guilan University of Medical Sciences by using an interdisciplinary teaching approach: A randomized controlled trial

Comparing the effectiveness of a pediatric airway management training program delivered through two methods of a role-playing simulation and an escape room-based serious game on knowledge and performance of students at Guilan University of Medical Sciences by using an interdisciplinary teaching approach: A randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20160102025809N3
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-07-13
Start date
2025-07-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

pediatric airway management.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Intervention Group One (Role-Playing with Simulation): In this group, educational content is presented to students through role-playing combined with simulation, do

Sponsors

Rasht University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Willingness to participate in research. the 6th and 7th years of professional medical students Fourth-year nursing undergraduate students Students in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th years of continuous undergraduate medical emergency studies.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Experience of the company in the workshop on air way management for children Experience in managing airways in children Being employed in emergency and ICU

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The score of the children's airway management knowledge in the knowledge questionnaire. Timepoint: Immediately after the intervention. Method of measurement: The questionnaire consists of 30 items that assess students' knowledge regarding airway management in children across 5 domains (Table 4). Each item is answered based on a 4-option scale (one correct answer, two incorrect answers, and one 'I don’t know' option). A correct answer receives a score of +1, an incorrect answer receives a score of -0.5, and an 'I don’t know' answer receives a score of zero.;Children's airway management performance score based on the checklist. Timepoint: Immediately after the intervention. Method of measurement: The performance checklist consists of 56 items that evaluate performance across 3 domains (Table 5). Each item contains two options: Yes and No. If the individual correctly performs the clinical process, the Yes option is marked; if unable to perform correctly, the No option will be completed by the evaluator.;The level of satisfaction with the teaching method in the satisfaction questionnaire. Timepoint: Immediately after the intervention. Method of measurement: The satisfaction questionnaire comprises 8 items that measure students' satisfaction regarding the teaching method used for airway management in children. Each item is answered based on a 5-option scale: Strongly Disagree (1), Disagree (2), Neutral (3), Agree (4), and Strongly Agree (5).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public Contactzahra taheri ezbarami

Rasht University of Medical Sciences

zahra_taheri@gums.ac.ir+98 13 3355 5058

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026