Skip to content

Comparative effect of anodal and cathodal direct cerebral electrical stimulation on postural control in chronic low back pain patients with high pain-related anxiety

Comparative effect of anodal and cathodal direct cerebral electrical stimulation on postural control in chronic low back pain patients with high pain-related anxiety

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20151228025732N46
Enrollment
66
Registered
2019-11-27
Start date
2019-06-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic low back pain. Low back pain

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group1: According to the treatment protocol, Anodal trans-cranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) is applied to the affected motor cortex is performed for patients. In

Sponsors

Semnan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 45 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 20-45 years old; Right-handed patients; Having pain-related anxiety score more than 30, based on Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) Suffering from chronic LBP (for more than six weeks or recurrent LBP with at least three episodes lasted more than one week over the past 12 months) A pain score less than 3 out of 10 on a visual analog scale (VAS) on the testing day

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any history of neurological diseases, such as Parkinson’s Disease, Alzheimer Reporting any history of psychological illnesses Presence of any signs of radiculopathy or root lumbar spinal cord involvement Structural deformities in the spine or the lower extremities such as scoliosis, kyphosis, or lordosis Any abnormalities in the vestibular system Cerebellar disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Static and dynamic balance evaluation ( in static and 4,7 level of dynamic condition; with both feet under open and closed eyes conditions during a 30 seconds trial). Timepoint: Before and immediately ,48 hours and one week after intervention. Method of measurement: Biodex Balance System (BBS) (302-950 model, Biodex Medical Systems, Inc. 20, New York, USA).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Error rate (number of errors/number of auditory signals(during 30 seconds test-7 trial)) during the auditory stroop task in dual take test. Timepoint: Before and immediately ,48 hours and one week after intervention. Method of measurement: Auditory stroop task (AST) written by a programmer and implemented by Matlab (R2018A, Mathworks, Navick, MA, USA) software.;Reaction time during the auditory stroop task in dual take test (the interval between the two consecutive stimuli will be randomized (2,000 ms to 3,000 ms). All reactions with response delays longer than 3,500 ms will be discarded). Timepoint: Before and immediately ,48 hours and one week after intervention. Method of measurement: Auditory stroop task (AST) written by a programmer and implemented by Matlab (R2018A, Mathworks, Navick, MA, USA) software.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMona Masoudi

Semnan University of Medical Sciences

masoudi.m94@yahoo.com+98 23 3365 4180

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026