Relationship study on the effect of ethical decision making training in speech and group discussion method on moral reasoning, distress and sensitivity of nurses.
Conditions
Interventions
Ethical decision making training in speech manner for one day (8 hours)
Third group (control): No training was provided.
Intervention 1: First group (intervention):
Ethical decision-making training in group discussion manner in a one-day workshop and for 8 hours. Intervention 2: Ethical decision making training in sp
Behavior
First group (intervention):
Ethical decision-making training in group discussion manner in a one-day workshop and for 8 hours.
Sponsors
Faculty of nursing, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
22 Years to 55 Years
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: nurses with B.Sc. degree, with at least one year work experience Exclusion criteria: non-filling the questionnaire, non-participation in training courses
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria:
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Moral reasoning. Timepoint: Before intervention, one month after intervention. Method of measurement: Crisham’s ethical dilemmas test questionnaire. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Moral sensivity. Timepoint: Before intervention, one month after intervention. Method of measurement: Lutzen Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire.;Moral distress. Timepoint: Before intervention, one month after intervention. Method of measurement: Ethical distress questionnaire of Atashzadeh. | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactMorteza Khaghanizade
Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences
Outcome results
None listed