Skip to content

The effect of rehabilitation exercises on upper extremity function and postural control in patients with stroke

Comparative study of the effect of competitive and noncompetitive exercises with nonlinear pedagogy method on upper extremity function and postural control in chronic stroke subjects

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2015110616830N6
Enrollment
48
Registered
2015-11-20
Start date
2015-11-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke. Cerebrovascular accident NOS

Interventions

Intervention 1: Group receiving upper extremity exercises in a competitive non-linear method: 21 sessions of upper extremity exercises in a competitive non-linear way in the form of playful volleyball
Rehabilitation
Group receiving upper extremity exercises in a competitive non-linear method: 21 sessions of upper extremity exercises in a competitive non-linear way in the form of playful volleyball activities (7 w
Control group: does not receive these exercises
Group receiving upper extremity exercises in a non-competitive non-linear method: 21 sessions of upper extremity exercises in a non-competitive non-linear way in the form of playful volleyball activit

Sponsors

Vice Chancellor for Research of Iran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
35 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: First experience of stroke; 6-24 months elapsing from injury; Age between 35-75 years; Lack of unilateral visuospatial neglect (i.e, score equal to 44 or above in star cancellation test); Having an acceptable primary sensory function in affected hand (i.e, having light touch sensation at the level of 4.31 monofilaments or better and having a pain and temperature sensation); No other problems, including orthopedic, rheumatologic or neurological problems resulted in further limitation in upper extremity (according to the patient or medical report); At least, having the ability of stage 5 of upper extremity and stage 4 of hand in Brunnstrum movement stages; Ability to walk 10 meters without assistive devices; No history of fall during the last 6 months according to the patient report; Having an acceptable level of cognitive function, i.e. score of more than 21 on the Mini-Mental Status Examination. Exclusion Criteria: Stroke recurrence during the study; Occurrence of other orthopedic, rheumatologic and neurologic problems affecting the upper limb function during the study; Unwillingness of patients to continue participating in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Motor function of upper extremity and hand. Timepoint: before and after intervention. Method of measurement: Wolf Motor Function? Motor Activity Log.;Coordination function of upper extremity and hand. Timepoint: before and after intervention. Method of measurement: Motion analysis system, Box and Block test, Purdue Pegboard test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Sensory function of hand and upper extremity. Timepoint: before and after intervention. Method of measurement: Weinsten Enhanced Sensory test, Wrist Position Sense Test, Properioception and Kinesthesia test, Two Point Discrimination test, Stregnosis test, Haptic Recognition Object Test, Hand Active Sensation Test.;Added at 2017-06-01: Postural control. Timepoint: Added at 2017-06-01: Before and after intervention. Method of measurement: Added at 2017-06-01: Force plate (postural sway parameters).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactGhorban Taghizadeh

Iran University of Medical Sciences

gh_taghizade@yahoo.com+98 21 2222 7124

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026