Breathing intubation with two different methods in patients with difficult intubation

Endotracheal intubation with laryngeal mask airway and bougie versus video laryngoscope in patients with difficult airway

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT2015102214056N6

Enrollment

Registered

2015-10-26

Start date

2015-11-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Difficult intubation. Failed or difficult intubation

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention 1. Endotracheal intubation with video laryngoscope. Intervention 2: Intervention 2. Endotracheal intubation with laryngeal mask airway and bougie.

Intervention 1. Endotracheal intubation with video laryngoscope.

Intervention 2. Endotracheal intubation with laryngeal mask airway and bougie.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: ASA class I–II; Age between 18-65 years old; Mallampati class III-IV; Negative upper lip bite test; Patients satisfaction; Not pregnant; No history of cardiovascular diseases (Arrhythmia, ischemia, and heart block); No history of coagulopathies; Not taking opioids. Exclusion criteria: Insufficient ventilation or lack of ventilation in time of induction.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Ease of intubation. Timepoint: After intubation. Method of measurement: Qualitative score.;The duration of intubation. Timepoint: After intubation. Method of measurement: Quantitative.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Hesameddin Modir

Arak University of Medical Sciences

He_modir@yahoo.com+98 86 3417 3641

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026