Skip to content

computerized patient decision aid system

The impact of a computerized decision aid on empowering pregnant women for choosing vaginal versus cesarean section delivery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2015093010777N4
Enrollment
400
Registered
2015-10-26
Start date
2016-04-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Delivery. Single spontaneous delivery, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group will receive a computer based decision aids on mode of delivery in addition to conventional care . Intervention 2: Control group will receive the conventional car
Intervention group will receive a computer based decision aids on mode of delivery in addition to conventional care .
Control group will receive the conventional care.

Sponsors

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Vice chancellor for research
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
16 Years to 48 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women 16 years and older; gestational age 28 week or more; singleton pregnancy. Exclusion criteria: Women do not provide a written informed consent; unable to read and write; unable to work with a computer; women whose method of delivery is predetermined by the physician, based on their clinical condition

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Decisional Conflict. Timepoint: Before the intervention and 4 till 10 weeks after of the intervention. Method of measurement: O’Connor's decisional conflict scale - University of Ottawa.;Knowledge. Timepoint: Before the intervention and 4 till 10 weeks after of the intervention. Method of measurement: true/false questions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Decisional Conflict subscales. Timepoint: Before and after of the intervention. Method of measurement: O’Connor's decisional conflict scale - University of Ottawa.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohsen Tafaghodi

Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Vice chancellor for research

tafaghodim@mums.ac.ir+98 51 3882 3251

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026