Comparing of effectiveness of two anesthetic techniques on inferior alveolar nerve block

Comparison of the effectiveness between conventional and modified inferior alveolar nerve block techniques

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20150924024167N2

Enrollment

Registered

2020-03-07

Start date

2017-09-23

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Indication of posterior teeth anesthesia in the form of bilateral. DA07.8: An impacted tooth is a tooth that is all the way or partially below the gum line and is not able to erupt properly. Wisdom teeth (third molars) as the most commonly impacted teeth

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: as modified technique, a 1.8 cc Lidocaine 2% anesthetic solution with 1.80000 epinephrine is used. The syringe body is placed on the occlusal of the first molar on

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 55 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who need the bilateral IANB for posterior mandibular tooth extractions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Systemic diseases Infection in the area History of sensitivity reaction to the anesthetic solutions History of surgery or fracture of the ramus ?Any medicament altering the pain perception Psychiatry disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of success rates between conventional and modified technique in the inferior alveolar nerve block. Timepoint: During the intervention. Method of measurement: Inquiring from patient - Observing, Testing and Measuring by the Researcher.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactEsshagh Lasemi

Islamic Azad University

elasemi@yahoo.com+98 21 2256 4571

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026