Skip to content

Comparison the effect of ischemic compression and lumbopelvic manipulation on pain and functioning in patellofemoral pain syndrome

Comparison of ischemic compression and lumbopelvic manipulation as trigger point therapy for patellofemoral pain syndrome in young adults: A double-blind randomized clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2015092324149N1
Enrollment
30
Registered
2015-10-30
Start date
2014-03-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patellofemoral pain syndrome. Other soft tissue disorders related to use, overuse and pressure

Interventions

Intervention 1: Ischemic compression: three sets of continuous pressure applied for 90 s on the myofascial trigger point (MTrP) of VMO, with a 30second rest between applications. Pressure was applied
Treatment - Other
Ischemic compression: three sets of continuous pressure applied for 90 s on the myofascial trigger point (MTrP) of VMO, with a 30second rest between applications. Pressure was applied until it produce
lumbopelvic manipulation: consisted of supine rotational glide manipulation of the ipsilateral lumbopelvic region of the involved knee

Sponsors

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: reported pain of more than 6 weeks duration in at least two of the following situations: patellar compression, squatting, prolonged sitting, walking, stair climbing, isometric quadriceps contraction; reported pain in one of the following tests: vastus medialis coordination test, patellar apprehension test, eccentric step test; presence of at least one MTrP in the VMO of the symptomatic knee; confirmed asymptomatic SIJ dysfunction on the side of the symptomatic knee with at least three of the following tests: Yeoman’s test, Gaenslen’s sign, the FABER test, the compression test, resisted hip abduction or a thigh thrust test Exclusion criteria: ligamentous insufficiency of the knee; meniscus damage; patellar subluxation or dislocation; nerve root compression; spine or lower extremity surgery; any systemic, orthopedic or neurological disorder; current physical therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: Before treatment, 1 week after treatment, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: NPRS.;Function. Timepoint: Before treatment, 1 week after treatment, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: kujala questionnaire.;Sensitivity to mechanical stimulation. Timepoint: Before treatment, 1 week after treatment, 1 month after treatment, 3 months after treatment. Method of measurement: PPT.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactFahimeh Kamali

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

fahimehkamali@hotmail.com; fahimekamalii@gmail.com+98 71 1627 1551

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026