Gingival wound healing. Dental examination
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: Intervention Group: Sides in LLLT group were treated with 808nm and 660nm laser irradiations, intraorally 1mm from the target tissue 200s for 660nm and 20s for 808nm to 3 aspects, bucc
Placebo
Intervention Group: Sides in LLLT group were treated with 808nm and 660nm laser irradiations, intraorally 1mm from the target tissue 200s for 660nm and 20s for 808nm to 3 aspects, buccal, lingual and
Control group: Sides in placebo sides the hand piece was put intraorally 1mm from the target tissue 200s for 660nm and 20s for 808nm to 3 aspects, buccal, lingual and occlusal, every 48hs until 12th d
Sponsors
Deputy Dean of research, Faculty of dentistry, Isfan University of Medical Sciences
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Patients were registered at the implant department of faculty of dentistry of Isfahan University of medical sciences, possessed of unilaterally posterior edentulous ridges, good bone quality, healthy systemic, not using corticosteroids and bisphosphonate, without sever anxiety and dentistry phobia, age at least 18, without mental disability Exclusion criteria: Low compliant patients, not attending at the expected time of measurement, smoking, any contraindication of laser therapy, pregnancy
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria:
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Wound healing. Timepoint: The third, seventh and fourteenth day after surgery. Method of measurement: Direct observation and comparison to standard images. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Pain. Timepoint: 12th, 24 th, 48 th and 72 th hour after surgery. Method of measurement: visual analogue scale (Vas). | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactSoheil Noohi
Faculty of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Outcome results
None listed