Skip to content

Comparison of tranexamic acid versus Kligman’s application in the treatment of macular amyloidosis

Comparison of efficacy and safety of intra lesional tranexamic acid injection versus topical Kligman’s formula application in the treatment of macular amyloidosis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20150529022468N5
Enrollment
40
Registered
2019-07-30
Start date
2018-11-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-10-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Macular amyloidosis. Other amyloidosis

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: tranexamic acid. Six sessions of treatment every two weeks are given by the physician as an intra lesional tranexamic acid. Each session, 0.1 cc of 4 mg / ml tranex

Sponsors

Iran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age range 18 to 50 years Suffering from macular amyloidosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant or lactating women History of cardiovascular disease Keloid patients Patients taking anticoagulants Any allergy to the study drugs History of bleeding disorder Topical treatment three months before entering the study No consent to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Skin darkness. Timepoint: 4, 8 and 12 weeks after start and 3 months after finishing the treatment. Method of measurement: The Visioface device, the third physician's opinion, and the patient's opinion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Drug side effects. Timepoint: 4, 8 and 12 weeks after start and 3 months after finishing the treatment. Method of measurement: Check list.;Onset of therapeutic effect. Timepoint: 4, 8 and 12 weeks after start and 3 months after finishing the treatment. Method of measurement: The Visioface device, the third physician's opinion, and the patient's opinion. The doctor's and patient opinion will be announced through the following options: 1. No response (no amelioration) 2. poor response (amelioration less than 25%) 3. average response (amelioration from 25% to 50%) 4. good response (amelioration from 50% to 75%) 5. very good response (amelioration by more than 75%).;Continuity of drug effect. Timepoint: 4, 8 and 12 weeks after start and 3 months after finishing the treatment. Method of measurement: The Visioface device, the third physician's opinion, and the patient's opinion. The doctor's and patient opinion will be announced through the following options: 1. No response: no amelioration 2. poor response: amelioration less than 25% 3. average response: amelioration from 25% to 50% 4. good response: amelioration from 50% to 75% 5. very good response: amelioration by more than 75%.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammadreza Ghassemi

Iran University of Medical Sciences

ghassemi.mr@iums.ac.ir+98 21 6650 2040

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026