Skip to content

Efficacy and safety evaluation of Suprotac® in comparison with Prograf® in prevention of liver transplant rejection

Open-label, randomized study to evaluate efficacy and safety of Suprotac® in comparison with Prograf® in liver transplant patients in Iran

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20150303021315N25
Enrollment
196
Registered
2021-09-13
Start date
2021-09-06
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver transplant. Liver transplant status

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Suprotac® (Nanoalvand) is administered at a dose of 0.1–0.15 mg/kg orally on the first day post-transplant. Then, dose will be adjusted if needed to reach the desir

Sponsors

Nanoalvand Company
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient aged between 18 to 70 years Ability to comprehend and willing to sign the informed consent form for this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Use of other investigational drugs at the time or within 30 days of enrolment, or within five half-lives of those drugs, whichever is longer (except for dialysis-related drugs which are not expected to interact with the study regimens) Patients with contraindication for tacrolimus or any other ingredients of the formulation Patients with Glomerular Filtration Rate greater than 30 at the time of enrolment to the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Transplantation rejection. Timepoint: All along the study duration until one year after transplantation surgery. Method of measurement: Liver transplant rejection approved by biopsy or clinical symptoms and laboratory tests (enhancement in alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase liver enzymes).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Death. Timepoint: All along the study duration until one year after transplantation surgery. Method of measurement: Incidence of death written in the adverse event’s section of the case report form.;Graft loss. Timepoint: All along the study duration until one year after transplantation surgery. Method of measurement: Transplant rejection not responsive to the treatment according to the biopsy or clinical symptoms and laboratory tests (enhancement in alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase liver enzymes).;Mean trough concentration per dose of tacrolimus. Timepoint: Baseline, months 2, 4, 6 and 10. Method of measurement: Dividing trough concentration to the consumed daily dose.;Adverse events. Timepoint: Baseline, months 2, 4, 6 and 10. Method of measurement: All adverse events are assessed through patient reporting, physician diagnosis, or laboratory abnormalities, and are then classified by severity (based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)), seriousness, relationship to the study drug, action taken, and outcome.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactNassim Anjidani

Orchid Pharmed

anjidani.n@orchidpharmed.com+98 21 4347 3000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026