Orthosis and Insole for patellar pain

Effects of the lateral wedged insoles and knee orthoses on the knee dynamic valgus in people with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20150210021034N4

Enrollment

Registered

2020-01-07

Start date

2015-05-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrom. Patellofemoral disorders

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Lateral wedge insole. This was a full-length insole made from poly-Vinyl acetate. The inclination of the insole in the frontal plan was 8 degrees for the affected l

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 35 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Positive Patella Femoral Grinding test Score more than three on visual analogue scale Age over 18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The history of fracture and surgery in the lower limb Instability of the knee due to trauma and other musculoskeletal disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Perception of the pain intensity during squat on the affected limb. Timepoint: All intervention was allocated in a straight forward session and outcomes were measured. Method of measurement: Participants were asked to indicate the intensity of the perceived pain on a 10 cm scale.;Gait symmetry. Timepoint: All intervention was allocated in a straight forward session and outcomes were measured. Method of measurement: Walking of participant was recorded using a motion capture system then parameters of the "gait symmetry" calculated and reported using a Visual 3D software.;Speed of walking. Timepoint: All intervention was allocated in a straight forward session and outcomes were measured. Method of measurement: Walking of participant was recorded using a motion capture system then parameters of the "walking velocity" calculated and reported using a Visual 3D software.;Peak of the frontal moment at knee during gait. Timepoint: Peak of the frontal moment at knee during gait. Method of measurement: Walking of participant was recorded using a motion capture system then parameters of the "Peak frontal moment at the knee" calculated and reported using a Visual 3D software.;Dynamic valgus angle during gait. Timepoint: All intervention was allocated in a straight forward session and outcomes were measured. Method of measurement: Walking of participant was recorded using a motion capture system then parameters of the "Dynamic valgus angle during gait" calculated and reported using a Visual 3D software.	—

Measure

Time frame

Perception of the pain intensity during squat on the affected limb. Timepoint: All intervention was allocated in a straight forward session and outcomes were measured. Method of measurement: Participants were asked to indicate the intensity of the perceived pain on a 10 cm scale.;Gait symmetry. Timepoint: All intervention was allocated in a straight forward session and outcomes were measured. Method of measurement: Walking of participant was recorded using a motion capture system then parameters of the "gait symmetry" calculated and reported using a Visual 3D software.;Speed of walking. Timepoint: All intervention was allocated in a straight forward session and outcomes were measured. Method of measurement: Walking of participant was recorded using a motion capture system then parameters of the "walking velocity" calculated and reported using a Visual 3D software.;Peak of the frontal moment at knee during gait. Timepoint: Peak of the frontal moment at knee during gait. Method of measurement: Walking of participant was recorded using a motion capture system then parameters of the "Peak frontal moment at the knee" calculated and reported using a Visual 3D software.;Dynamic valgus angle during gait. Timepoint: All intervention was allocated in a straight forward session and outcomes were measured. Method of measurement: Walking of participant was recorded using a motion capture system then parameters of the "Dynamic valgus angle during gait" calculated and reported using a Visual 3D software.

—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactEbrahim Sadeghi-Demneh

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

sadeghi@rehab.mui.ac.ir+98 31 3792 5235

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026