Skip to content

Effect of sensory motor training on the upper limb function of patients with Parkinson's disease

The effect of sensory- motor training on hand and upper extremity sensory and motor function in patients with Parkinson's disease

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2015020816830N2
Enrollment
40
Registered
2015-05-10
Start date
2015-04-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's disease. Extrapyramidal and movement disorders

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: receives 10 sessions of sensory-motor training (5 sessions per week, 3 to 5 hours per session). Intervention 2: Control group: does not receive this training.
Rehabilitation
Intervention group: receives 10 sessions of sensory-motor training (5 sessions per week, 3 to 5 hours per session).
Control group: does not receive this training.

Sponsors

Vice Chancellor for research of Iran University of Medical Sciences,
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
55 Years to 65 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria:Having Parkinson's disease according to neurologist diagnosis; Having the disease progression level of 1 to 3 according to Hoehn and Yahr Scale; Having an acceptable level of cognitive function, i.e. score of more than 24 on the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE); To be eligible for sensory-motor retraining (Having the light touch sensation at the level of acceptable mono-filaments, i.e. 4.31 and above in the fingertips and no severe problems of proprioception and discrimination sensation); Not having orthopedic problems (neurologic damages, fracture, tendon injuries), rheumatologic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis), neurologic diseases (stroke, multiple sclerosis) and other diseases such as diabetes, hepatitis and burns; Having the ability to read and write. Exclusion Criteria: Lack of patient cooperation during the test; Not return for the testing after the intervention; Entering to the nonpharmacologic on-off phase of the disease during the study according to neurologist diagnosis; Change in the pharmacologic regimen of the patient during the study; Inability to complete the activities of treatment interventions and progress to the harder levels of the intervention up to 70% of the protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Motor function of hand and upper extremity. Timepoint: before and after intervention. Method of measurement: Box and Block, and Purdue Pegboard tests.;Extroceptive and proprioceptive sense of hand and upper extremity. Timepoint: before and after intervention. Method of measurement: Weinsten Enhanced Sensory test, Properioception and Kinesthesia test, Wrist Position test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Discrimative sense of hand and upper extremity. Timepoint: before and after intervention. Method of measurement: Two-point discrimination test, Haptic Recognition Object test,Hand Active Sensation test, Stregnosis test.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactGhorban Taghizadeh

Iran University of Medical Sciences

gh_taghizade@yahoo.com+98 21 2222 7124

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026