Skip to content

The effect of taping on performance in athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Comparison of effect of two taping method (kinesio and Mcconnell) and their effect on functional activities and pain in athlete with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2015012420764N1
Enrollment
30
Registered
2015-05-10
Start date
2014-10-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patellofemoral pain syndrome. Chondromalacia

Interventions

Intervention 1: For first group McConnell taping will apply to correct the position of the patella layer was applied from lateral femoral condyle to just posterior of the medial femoral condyle. The p
Rehabilitation
For first group McConnell taping will apply to correct the position of the patella layer was applied from lateral femoral condyle to just posterior of the medial femoral condyle. The patella will comp
For second group The kinsio taping will apply from the direction of origin to insertion with 25-50% of its maximal length tension? which was proposed to provide muscle facilitation effect.
For control group will not perform any taping

Sponsors

Vice-Chancellery for Research of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 35 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion critria: behind or around the patella pain resulting from at least two of the following activities: prolonged sitting, ascending or descending the stairs, prolonged walking, squatting, running, kneeling, and hopping or jumping? existance of symptoms for at least 1? lateral shift of patella? tight lateral structure of knee? Average pain score =3 cm on a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) at the time of the evaluation? and at least grade 11 in Functional Index Questionnaire. ?Exclusion critria: a history of patellar dislocation or subluxatio? bilateral PFP,had an allergy to adhesive tape? referred pain from the lumbar spine and hip joint? severe leg length discrepancy more 2 cm? patella tendinitis (‘Jumper’s knee’)? tibial tubercle apophysitis (Osgood Schlatters disease)? bursitis; infrapatella fat pad lesion (Hoffa’s syndrome).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: Before ,immediately after intervention ,24 hr and 48 hr after intervention. Method of measurement: Visual analog scale.;Reach distance in dynamic balance. Timepoint: Before ,immediately after intervention ,24 hr and 48 hr after intervention. Method of measurement: Tape.;Vertical jump. Timepoint: Before ,immediately after intervention ,24 hr and 48 hr after intervention. Method of measurement: Tape.;Sprint. Timepoint: Before ,immediately after intervention ,24 hr and 48 hr after intervention. Method of measurement: Chronometer.;Measurement of isometric quadriceps muscle. Timepoint: Before ,immediately after intervention ,24 hr and 48 hr after intervention. Method of measurement: Dynamometer.;Shuttle running(agility). Timepoint: Before ,immediately after intervention ,24 hr and 48 hr after intervention. Method of measurement: Chronometer.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMahlegha Mortazavi

Shiraz School of Rehabilitation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

m_mortazavi@sums.ac.ir+98 917 260 2774

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026