surgical guide in jaw surgery

A Comparative study to assess feasibility of computer assisted designed and fabricated surgical guides in sagittal split osteotomy vs. conventional sagittal split osteotomy.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20150107020601N2

Enrollment

Registered

2018-02-10

Start date

2018-01-10

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthognatic surgery, feasibility of computer assisted designed and fabricated surgical guide in sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Mandibular hyperplasia

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: The Mandibular ramus side for which computer assisted designed and fabricated surgical guide will be used will intervention group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to 35 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age between 18-35 years. Patients that has Mandibular sagittal split osteotomy in their treatment plan using virtual surgical planningit osteotomy in their treatment plan using virtual surgical planning

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The patients with a history of Trigeminal nerve Neurosensory disturbance If genioplasty is included in treatment plan Have medical condition associated with neuropathy (like Diabetic, Hypertension and Kidney problem Those unwilling to sign informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. Inferior Alveolar nerve neurosensory disturbance. Timepoint: 1. Neurosensory disturbance will be assessed at second week, first month and three month after operation. Method of measurement: A. Quantitative neurosensory testing lower lip and chin 1. Direction of brush stroke using cotton 2.Two point discrimination using needle 3.Tactile threshold using Semmes–Weinstein (SW) monofilament . 4. Temperature awareness by using a tube filled hot water or ice B. Subjective neurosensory testing using a visual analogue scale (VAS).	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Inferior Alveolar nerve neurosensory disturbance. Timepoint: 1. Neurosensory disturbance will be assessed at second week, first month and three month after operation. Method of measurement: A. Quantitative neurosensory testing lower lip and chin 1. Direction of brush stroke using cotton 2.Two point discrimination using needle 3.Tactile threshold using Semmes–Weinstein (SW) monofilament . 4. Temperature awareness by using a tube filled hot water or ice B. Subjective neurosensory testing using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Duration of osteotomy. Timepoint: Intraoperative. Method of measurement: minute.;Unfavorbale fracture. Timepoint: intraoperative. Method of measurement: yes/ no.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactShimelis Megersa Gema

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

megersagema@razi.tums.ac.ir+98 21 6701 0419

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026