Episiotomy repair success with different suture wire

Comparison of chromic cutgot and polygalactin 910 and vicryl rapid in episiotomy repair

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20141208020249N5

Enrollment

120

Registered

2019-02-01

Start date

2017-06-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Episiotomy repair. Perineal laceration during delivery

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: suture with chromic cutgut. Intervention 2: Intervention group: suture with polygalactin 910. Intervention 3: Intervention group: suture with vicryl.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patient who had episiotomy and requires repair of episiotomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: People with diabetes People with chronic disease People with collagen vascular disease Low socioeconomic conditions BMI above 35 Corticosteroid treatment Prolonged delivery Prolonged premature rupture of embryonic membrane

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Episiotomy Repair. Timepoint: 2, 7, 42 day. Method of measurement: Observation and Examination.;Pain. Timepoint: 2, 7, 42 day. Method of measurement: Based on the patient's expression, one to nine (1-3 mild, 4-6 moderate, 7-9 severe).	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSholeh Shahgheibi

Sanandaj University of Medical Sciences

shahgheibi@yahoo.com+98 87 3328 2004

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026