Effect of Articaine on the Efficacy and Pain of Intraoral Anesthetic Injection

Comparison of Effectiveness and Pain Perception of Articain and Lidocain during Dental Second Molar Infiltration in 5-7 Years Old Childeren

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT2014110213218N3

Enrollment

Registered

2014-11-13

Start date

2014-11-22

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effectivness and Pain Iintensity during Iintraoral Anesthesia.

Interventions

Intervention 1: Lidocain 2% with 1/80000 epinephrine, one dose, 1.8 ml for infiltration annesthesia. Intervention 2: Articaine4%, one dose, with epinephrine 1/100000, for block or infiltration anesth

Treatment - Drugs

Lidocain 2% with 1/80000 epinephrine, one dose, 1.8 ml for infiltration annesthesia

Articaine4%, one dose, with epinephrine 1/100000, for block or infiltration anesthesia

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

5 Years to 7 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria: Healthy 5-7 years old children who need Bilateral Buccal Infiltration Injection in Second Primary Molar and those who will be in cooperative group (Frankle 3-4). Exclusion Criteria: Children with Systemic Disease, Mental Retardation, History of dental treatment, Sensitivity to anesthetics, Taking medications that affect pain.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Effectivness. Timepoint: during treatment. Method of measurement: SEM Scale.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Pain Intensity. Timepoint: during injection. Method of measurement: SEM Scale.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactZahra Jami

Zahedan University of Medical Science

zjami92@yahoo.com+98 54 1232 4013

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026