Evaluation of Gingival Dimension After Two Different Techniques for Second Stage of Implant Surgery

Clinical Evaluation Of Keratinized Gingiva After Implant Exposure Using Diode Laser And Punch Technique

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT201409175305N4

Enrollment

Registered

2017-06-14

Start date

2017-01-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival recession. Gingival recession (generalized)(localized)(postinfective)(post-operative)

Interventions

Intervention 1: intervention group: implant exposure by diode laser. Intervention 2: Control group: implant exposure through punching by scalpel.

Treatment - Surgery

intervention group: implant exposure by diode laser

Control group: implant exposure through punching by scalpel

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Presence of sufficient keratinized gingiva, as at least 9mm of keratinized tissue would be available; Absence of bone loss assessed through periapical radiography prior to the second stage of implant surgery; Patient cosent Exclusion criteria: Patient's incompliance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Keratinized gingiva dimension. Timepoint: At surgery time, and then weekly for four weeks post surgery. Method of measurement: By periodontal probe.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Pain. Timepoint: One week after surgery. Method of measurement: Visual analogue scale (VAS).	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Mohammad Mohammadi

Periodontics Department, Kerman Dental School

m_mohammadi@kmu.ac.ir+98 34 3211 9021

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026