Skip to content

The effects of group training with teach back method with and without telephone follow-up on quality of life and hospital readmission of patients with heart failure

Comparison the effects of group training with teach back method with and without telephone follow-up on quality of life and hospital readmission of patients with heart failure with heart failure

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2014091319146N1
Enrollment
100
Registered
2014-10-11
Start date
2014-08-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart failure. Heart failure, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention 1: In intervention group, patients will train with group teach back method. At first, details will describe with simple language for patients
then patients will ask to recount the educational training with their own language until access to patients’ comprehension thoroughly. To investigate the effect of telephone follow-up, patients will d
Prevention
In intervention group, patients will train with group teach back method. At first, details will describe with simple language for patients
In control group, routine hospital training will present and for assessing the effectiveness of telephone follow-up, patients will divide into two groups. The first control group will follow up by tel

Sponsors

Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: being older than 40 years old; diagnosis of heart failure by the attending physician; presence of heart failure at least 6 months from diagnosis; having fully consciousness and being familiar with Persian language, lack of any psychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia; lack of drug addiction; lack of acute physical illness such as dialysis or any other diseases that prevent the learning process. Exclusion criteria: patient refusal to continue follow-up; any physical problems other than those related to heart failure or mental problems that occur during intervention and prevent training process; being absence in two training sessions continually.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Readmission rate. Timepoint: Baseline and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Ask the patient, their family and reading medical records.;Quality of Life. Timepoint: Baseline and one month after the intervention. Method of measurement: Minnesota Heart Failure Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Physical dimensionl of quality of life. Timepoint: Before and one month after intervention. Method of measurement: Quality of life questionnaire.;Spiritual dimension of quality of life. Timepoint: Before and one month after intervention. Method of measurement: Quality of life questionnaire.;Socio-economic dimension of quality of life. Timepoint: Before and one month after intervention. Method of measurement: Quality of life questionnaire.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMdineh Dastoom

Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences

dastoom.m@ajums.ac.ir+98 67 2322 4007

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026