Skip to content

Comparison of the efficacy of platelet-enriched plasma injection and laser on knee arthrosis

Comparative Study of The Effectiveness of The Injection of Platelet Rich Plasma with Using High Intensity Laser Therapy Compared with Platelet Rich Plasma and High Intensity Laser Therapy on The Pain, Range of Motion and Function of Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis a single blind randomized control trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20140907019073N6
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-10-31
Start date
2022-11-02
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis of knee

Interventions

Intervention 1: First Intervention group:First intervention group: Preparation of PRP solution and injection will be done in sports medicine clinic of Hazrat Rasool Akram Hospital. The patients of bot

Sponsors

Iran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
50 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Grade 2 and 3 of primary knee osteoarthritis acording to KL criteria Age 50-75 year Persistent knee pain for at least 6 months with intensity more than 4 according to VAS in activity such as going up and down stair, long period of sitting and squatting Ability to walk independently for more than 30 m. BMI below 35 kg/m2 The patient has full consent to participate in the research. The patient should have a balanced mental state.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The patient has a history of intra-articular injection in the knee during the last six months. The patient has neuromuscular diseases. The patient has a history of acute traumatic injury to other ligaments and structures of the knee joint with the approval of a specialist. The patient has a history of surgery or previous injury in the knee and other lower limb joints over the last year. The patient has bone implants. The patient has a new fracture in the lower extremities during the last year. The patient has malignant tumors. The patient has participated in exercise therapy and physiotherapy programs during the last three months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Knee function with WOMAC(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) scale. Timepoint: Before the intervention and one month and three months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire.;Feeling knee pain by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Timepoint: Before the intervention and one month and three months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Knee range of motion. Timepoint: Before the intervention, one month and three months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Goniometry.;Timed Up & Go test: The ability of a person to get up from a chair over a distance of 3 meters and return to the chair. Timepoint: Before the intervention, one month and three months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Stopwatch (seconds).;Six Minute Walk test: The person's ability to walk for 6 minutes. Timepoint: Before the intervention, one month and three months after the intervention. Method of measurement: Distance measurement (meter).;Stair climbing test: The ability of a person to climb stairs to reach the stage of pain or fatigue. Timepoint: Before the intervention, one month and three months after the intervention. Method of measurement: The number of steps taken.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAli Mazaherinezhad

Iran University of Medical Sciences

mazaherinezhad@gmail.com+98 21 6435 2446

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026