Skip to content

The effect of taping on performance in athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome

The comparison of two taping methods on pain, EMG activity and dynamic balance in athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2014071515932N3
Enrollment
32
Registered
2014-08-16
Start date
2014-08-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patellofemoral pain syndrome. Chondromalacia

Interventions

Intervention 1: Kinesiologic tape will be attached with 15%-25% tension to VL inhibitory group from insertion to origin so it will be applied from tibial tuberosity following VL path, up to 1/3 of t
Rehabilitation
Kinesiologic tape will be attached with 15%-25% tension to VL inhibitory group from insertion to origin so it will be applied from tibial tuberosity following VL path, up to 1/3 of the proximal tigh
For VMO facillatory group tape with 25%-50% tension will be attached from origin to insertion so it will be applied from 1/3 of the proximal tigh following VMO path down to tibial tuberosity

Sponsors

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion critria: unilateral anterior or retropatellar knee pain while engaged in at least 2 of the following activities: prolonged sitting, climbing stairs, squatting, running, kneeling and jumping; existance of symptoms for at least 2 month; an average pain level of 3cm on a 10-cm visual analog scale; an insidious onset of symptoms unrelated to a traumatic incident and at least grade 11 in Functional Index Questionnaire. ?Exclusion critria: recent history of hip; knee or ankle surgery; a history of patellar dislocation or subluxation; or clinical evidence of meniscal lesion; ligamentous instability; patellar tendon pathology; chondral damage; osteoarthritis; or spinal referred pain; systemic diseases such as diabetes and rheumatism and bilateral PFP.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The onse and amplitude of electromyographic activity. Timepoint: Before the intervention and immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: Telemetry EMG (Mega electronics Ltd.Finland).;Pain. Timepoint: Before the intervention and immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: Visual analog scale.;Reach distance in dynamic balance. Timepoint: Before the intervention and immediately after intervention. Method of measurement: Tape.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactVahideh Foroozantabar

Shiraz School of Rehabilitation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Foroozantabar.v@gmail.com+98 71 1626 2240

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026