Skip to content

The comparison between two surgical methods in acute dislocations of acromiococlavicular joints

Comparison results of acromioclavicular dislocations treatment by screw, with and without coracoclavicular suture in patients with acute acromioclavicular dislocations

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2014061018030N1
Enrollment
40
Registered
2014-11-09
Start date
2010-03-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute dislocations of acromioclavicular joint. ?Dislocations of Acromioclavicular joint

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: In this group in addition to open reduction and fixation with screw, coracoclavicular suture with 3 bands of absorbable sutures(Vicryle)was used. Intervention 2: C
Treatment - Surgery
Intervention group: In this group in addition to open reduction and fixation with screw, coracoclavicular suture with 3 bands of absorbable sutures(Vicryle)was used.
Control group:20 patients in control group were only fixated by coracoclavicular screw withou any sutures.

Sponsors

Vice Chancellor for research of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 54 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Informed consent for participating in the trial ; No history of surgery and former trauma in the same shoulder joint and upper limb ; No history of systemic disorders such as Diabetes and hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism ; No history of former pathology in the same joint such as calcified tendinitis ; No simultaneous fractures in the time of damage Exclusion criteria: Multi traumatic patients ; type 3 and 6 dislocations

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Constant. Timepoint: third,sixth and twelfth weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: standard Constant questionnaire.;Restoring shoulder function. Timepoint: Three and six months after intervention. Method of measurement: Restoring the shoulder range of motion.;Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Timepoint: Thirs, sixth, and twelfth weeks after intervention. Method of measurement: Based on patients' statements, subjectively.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAsghar Elmi

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

elmimail@yahoo.com+98 41338593147

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026