The Comparison of Implant Stability between two different techniques of implant placement

The Comparison of Implant Stability using Resonance Frequency Analysis between two different techniques of implant placement; Osteotome versus Conventional drilling: A controlled randomized clinical trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT201405274621N2

Enrollment

Registered

2014-06-08

Start date

2010-01-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

implant placement in edentulus area. Presence of tooth-root and mandibular implants

Interventions

Intervention 1: inervention: using osteotome technique for implant placement. Intervention 2: control group: use of conventional drilling for implant placement.

Treatment - Surgery

inervention: using osteotome technique for implant placement

control group: use of conventional drilling for implant placement

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 70 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: inclusion criteria: posterior maxillary missing tooth / teeth; minimum; 8mm ridge height and 6mm width; good oral hygiene. Exclusion criteria: systemic diseases that affect host healing responses; Heavy smoking (more than 10 cigarette per day); need for bone grafting.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Stability of dental implant. Timepoint: baseline (implant placement)-3 months. Method of measurement: ISQ value using resonance frequency analysis.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr R Sadeghi

Shahed University

sadeghi@shahed.ac.ir+98 21 8895 9210

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026