Compare of influence different two suture

Compare of influence different two suture techeniques on periodontal healh of the mandibular second molars after extraction of impact third molar

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT2014052017781N1

Enrollment

Registered

2014-07-15

Start date

2013-12-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

impacted tooth. Embedded and impacted teeth

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: sutures Anchor. Intervention 2: Controls: Use a simple loop suture.

Treatment - Surgery

Intervention group: sutures Anchor

Controls: Use a simple loop suture

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

20 Years to 25 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: totally bone-impacted mandibular third molar with mesioangular or vertical classi?cation and requiring ostectomy and odontotomy; age25 years; Systemic disease; Surgery within the last 6 months; smoker; Second molars of carious

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
PPD. Timepoint: Before surgery and 3 and 6 months after surgery. Method of measurement: Probe Williams.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Plaque Index. Timepoint: 3 months after treatment and 6 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Disclozing tab.;Gingival Index. Timepoint: 3 months after treatment and 6 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Periodental probs.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactFouzieh vahidnia

University of Medical Sciences

dr.vahidnia@yahoo.com+98 84 2323 2133

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026