Skip to content

Effects of exercises on balance and falls in patients with multiple sclerosis

Effects of perturbation-based balance training versus traditional balance training on balance and risk of falling in people with multiple sclerosis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20140519017752N2
Enrollment
30
Registered
2018-10-31
Start date
2018-11-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: receive walking and balance exercises with perturbation
Participants received 20-minute individualized (1 trainer to 1 participant) training sessions, 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Intervention 2: Control group: receive walking and balance exercises without
Participants received 20-minute individualized (1 trainer to 1 participant) training sessions, 3 times a week for 4 weeks.

Sponsors

Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 64 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: A definite diagnosis of MS, relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive types, as diagnosed by a neurologist; History of falls in past 3 months; Ability to stand independently; Ability to walk independently at least for 100 meters; Ages between 18-64 years; MMSE more than 24; EDSS below 5/5 Exclusion criteria: Experiencing an exacerbation of symptoms due to relapse within 3 months of the baseline measurement; Any musculoskeletal or neurological conditions except MS limiting balance or gait; Uncorrected Auditory or visual impairment; Pregnancy; Involving in the other planned treatment; Receiving treatments to improve balance in past 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Static Balance. Timepoint: Before and after intervention (at the end of 4th week). Method of measurement: Force plate.;Ability to adapt to unexpected changes in orientation of the support surface. Timepoint: Before and after intervention (at the end of 4th week). Method of measurement: "Adaptation test" in Computerized Dynamic Posturography system (Neurocom).;Effectiveness of the patient’s automatic motor responses to external perturbation. Timepoint: Before and after intervention (at the end of 4th week). Method of measurement: "Motor Control test" in Computerized Dynamic Posturography system (Neurocom).;Dynamic balance. Timepoint: Before and after intervention (at the end of 4th week). Method of measurement: Time Up and Go Test, 10 meter walk test.;Functional balance. Timepoint: Before and after intervention (at the end of 4th week). Method of measurement: Berg balance scale.;Balance confidence. Timepoint: Before and after intervention (at the end of 4th week). Method of measurement: Activities Specific Balance Confidence scale.;Fear of fall. Timepoint: Before and after intervention (at the end of 4th week). Method of measurement: Fall Efficacy Scale – International.;Fall rate. Timepoint: Before and after intervention (at the end of 4th week). Method of measurement: Fall diary.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSaeideh Monjezi

Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences

saeideh.monjezi@yahoo.com+98 61 1374 3101

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026