Comparison of two methods of percutaneous pinning in treatment of proximal phalanges fractures

Comparison of two methods of parallel percutaneous pinning from metacarpal head and cross pinning from condyle of proximal phalanx in proximal phalanx fractures in referrals to Shahid Bahonar Hospital, Kerman

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT201405142115N3

Enrollment

Registered

2016-02-23

Start date

2016-03-08

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

extraarticular fracture of proximal pahalanx. Fracture of other finger

Interventions

Intervention 1: In the first group the pins will be inserted from skin to the phalangeal condyles. Intervention 2: In the second group the pins will be inserted to the metacarpal head and then to the

Treatment - Surgery

In the first group the pins will be inserted from skin to the phalangeal condyles.

In the second group the pins will be inserted to the metacarpal head and then to the phalanx via skin

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion Criteria: informed consent? proximal phalanx extra-articular fracture, except thumb Exclusion Criteria: Multiple fingers fractures? pathological fractures?3 pregnancy? Any underlying disease affecting bone healing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Finger joint range of motion. Timepoint: two months. Method of measurement: Goniameter.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Infection. Timepoint: teo months. Method of measurement: lab nad examination.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAlireza Saied

Kerman University of medical Sceinces

arsaiedmd@yahoo.com+98 34 3246 2229

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026