Skip to content

Comparison of performance of two kinds of lower jaw growth stimulator device in patients with deficiency in lower jaw growth

Comparison of treatment results and patient satisfaction of Classic Twin-block and Clear Twin-block in classII, div 1 malocclusions.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2014040817180N1
Enrollment
66
Registered
2014-04-30
Start date
2014-05-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthodontic pateints with class II,division 1 malocclusion. Anomalies of jaw-cranial base relationship

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group one: 33 pateints treated with clear twin block functional appliance. Intervention 2: intervention group two :33 pateints treated with classic twin block functional a
Treatment - Devices
Intervention group one: 33 pateints treated with clear twin block functional appliance
intervention group two :33 pateints treated with classic twin block functional appliance

Sponsors

Vice chancellor for research and technology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
8 Years to 11 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: age between 8 to 11 years old; overjet of 4 to 8 millimeter; class II, division 1 malocclusion with ANB angle greater than 3 degree; Frankfort mandibular angle between 20 to 25 degree; being in cervical vertebral maturation stage of 1 to 3. Exclusion criteria: craniofacial syndromes; history of trauma to jaws; history of orthodontic treatment or premolar extraction.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Reduction of overjet to 1 to 2 millimeter. Timepoint: After completion of functional therapy. Method of measurement: Cephalometric analysis with the aid of dolphin software before and after treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patients satisfaction from treatment. Timepoint: 4 mounths after beginig of treatment. Method of measurement: Questionarie.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mohammad Karim Soltani

Hamadan University of Medical Sciences

m.k.soltani@umsha.ac.ir; mksoltani2002@yahoo.com00898118381059

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026