Skip to content

Comparison of Mucoderm with connective tissue graft on root coverage

Comparison of Mucoderm with connective tissue graft on root coverage in Miller class I and II gingival recessions

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20140318017053N10
Enrollment
10
Registered
2019-04-13
Start date
2018-12-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-04-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Root coverage treatment. Root coverage treatment

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: grafting with connective tissue graft. Intervention 2: Intervention group: grafting with Mucoderm.

Sponsors

Islamic Azad University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with Miller class I and II gingival recessions with 2 mm or more

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who smoke Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding Patients with systemic diseases which have surgical contraindications Patients who consume drugs with adverse effects on gingivae Patients with inappropriate oral hygiene Teeth which are abutments for partial denture, orthodontic brackets, crowns, decays and cervical fillings

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Root coverage percentage. Timepoint: Before surgery and 1, 3 and 6 month after surgery. Method of measurement: Gingival Recession depth measurement with Williams probe.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Measurement of keratinized tissue, pocket depth and attachment level. Timepoint: Before, 1, 3 and 6 months after therapy. Method of measurement: By periodontal probe.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactFerena Sayar

Islamic Azad University

f_sayar@dentaliau.ac.ir+98 21 2256 4571

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026