Skip to content

The Comparison of Free gingival unit graft and free gingival graft for the Treatment of Gingival Recession

The Comparison of Free gingival unit graft and free gingival graft for the Treatment of Gingival Recession

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT201403061760N33
Enrollment
9
Registered
2014-04-27
Start date
2014-03-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession. Gingival Recession

Interventions

Intervention 1: Case group (free gingival unit graft): the donor gingival unit graft was dissected from the palatal aspect of the maxillary premolars. Care will be taken to obtain a graft thickness of
Treatment - Surgery
Case group (free gingival unit graft): the donor gingival unit graft was dissected from the palatal aspect of the maxillary premolars. Care will be taken to obtain a graft thickness of 1 mm. The graf
Control group ( conventional free gingival graft): the donor palatal graft was harvested from the palate corresponding to the premolar area but ‡2 mm away from the gingival margin. Care will be taken

Sponsors

Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology, Babol University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: there is a single two-way analysis of facial tissue depth of 2mm = X CEJ on anterior teeth or premolars; putting all subgroup analyzes of Miller class I / II; selected teeth without root fillings and no bleeding after probing; people over 18 years of age; ability to maintain good oral hygiene (% 20 O'Leary plaque score=); sufficient depth of vestibule. Exclusion criteria: pregnancy; interfere with the healing agents (corticosteroids, anti-cancer) or medicines that may lead to gingival enlargement; smoking; administration has banned any local or systemic disease, periodontal surgery; traumatic brushing techniques, brushing hard or abrasive toothpastes; history of periodontal surgery in the area in the past 2 years; the use of removable prosthodontic or orthodontic appliances in the area; known allergies to materials used in surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Treatment of Gingival Recession. Timepoint: Six months after surgery. Method of measurement: clinical.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Healing. Timepoint: One, three and six months after surgery. Method of measurement: Indexed repair Landry.;Pain relief after surgery. Timepoint: One, three and six months after surgery. Method of measurement: pain Index (VAS).;Esthetic. Timepoint: One, three and six months after surgery. Method of measurement: Esthetic index (VAS).;Percentage of root coverage (RC). Timepoint: One, three and six months after surgery. Method of measurement: Clinical.;Clinical Attachment Level ( CAL ). Timepoint: Three and six months after surgery. Method of measurement: Mm.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Mohadese Yazdan Panah

Dental School, Babol University of Medical Sciences

mohadese.yazdanpanah@yahoo.com+98 11 1229 1408

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026