Skip to content

Evaluating the Effect of Mental Practices on the Movement of Adults with Cerebral Palsy

Evaluating the Effect of Motor Imaginary Training on Motor Learning of Adults with Cerebral Palsy: the role of anxiety and age

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20140304016830N15
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-07-28
Start date
2025-08-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spastic cerebral palsy. Spastic diplegic cerebral palsy

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention Group 1 (Occupational-Based Group with MIT): Participants in this group will attend a total of 23 sessions. The first session will consist of a data collection session, in

Sponsors

Iran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a diagnosis of spastic CP and no other neurological disorders upon self-declaration of participant having the age of more than 18 years the ability to stand and walk either with or without assistance Not having severe depression the ability to communicate discomfort or pain the comprehension of simple instructions of the tasks during intervention and data collection sessions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any contraindications to participating in the training sessions botulinum toxin (BoTox) injections within six months before the assessment the presence of an intrathecal baclofen pump or any surgical intervention in the past 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Functional mobility. Timepoint: Baseline, post-intervention (month 2), and follow-up (month 2). Method of measurement: Functional mobility will be assessed through Timed Up and Go (TUG) test to evaluate a person's mobility, balance, walking ability, and fall risk. lower score in this test indicates better performance in movement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Functional balance. Timepoint: Baseline, post-intervention (month 2), and follow-up (month 2). Method of measurement: Berg Balance Scale (BBS).;Quality of life. Timepoint: Baseline, post-intervention (month 2), and follow-up (month 2). Method of measurement: World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire- Brief version.;Gait parameters. Timepoint: Baseline, post-intervention (month 2), and follow-up (month 2). Method of measurement: measuring speed, step length, and step width during walking.;Motor imagery ability. Timepoint: Baseline, post-intervention (month 2), and follow-up (month 2). Method of measurement: Chronometer test, and Laterality test.;Anxiety level. Timepoint: Baseline, post-intervention (month 2), and follow-up (month 2). Method of measurement: Anxiety subscale of Hospital and Depression Scale (HADS).

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactGhorban Taghizadeh

Iran University of Medical Sciences

taghizadeh.gh@iums.ac.ir+98 21 2222 7124

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026