Skip to content

Effect of nanofat injection in the treatment of stretch marks

Comparison of the effect of nanofat graft with microneedling in the clinical improvement of striae distensae

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20140212016557N10
Enrollment
20
Registered
2022-01-22
Start date
2022-01-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Striae distensae. Striae atrophicae

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: Nanofat grafting in the striae of one side of the body (one session at the beginning of study). Intervention 2: Control group: microneedling in striae of one side o

Sponsors

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patients of 18 to 60 years of age bilateral striae distensae (alba and rubra) site on the abdomen, buttock, calves, thighs, and arms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: pregnancy lactation body mass index less than or equal to 22 history of nickel hypersensitivity history of treatment for striae in the recent one year history of hypertrophic scar or keloid formation active infections on the study area severe underlying internal diseases history of hypercoagulation states Consumption of immunosuppressant drugs, systemic retinoids, corticosteroids, and anabolic steroids in the recent 2 months history of allergy to any ingredient of tumescent anesthetic solution history of abdominoplasty scar on the fat donor site history of Cushing syndrome history of polycystic ovary syndrome body dysmorphic disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical improvement of striae. Timepoint: The patients will be assessed in 3 monthly visits for microneedling, and 6 months after the first visit. Method of measurement: Global aesthetic improvement scale, measured as: Grade 0: Worsening of lesions; Grade 1: No change (< 25% improvement); Grade 2: Improved (25-50% improvement); Grade 3: Much improved (51-75% improvement); Grade 4: Very much improved (76-100% improvement).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Striae size reduction. Timepoint: 3 monthly visits for microneedling, and 6 months after the first visit. Method of measurement: Percentage of striae width reduction.;Striae color. Timepoint: At the beginning of treatment, 3 monthly visits for microneedling, and 6 months after the first visit. Method of measurement: Pigment index is measured by colorimetric device.;Dermoscopic features of striae. Timepoint: At the beginning of treatment, 3 monthly visits for microneedling, and 6 months after the first visit. Method of measurement: Dermatoscopic features like color, vascularity, width, and texture of striae.;Patient satisfaction. Timepoint: At the end of treatment. Method of measurement: ?A 5-point scale. 4: Extremely satisfied, 3:Very satisfied, 2: satisfied, 1: Slightly satisfied, 0: Not satisfied.;Pain during treatment. Timepoint: At the 3 sessions of monthly treatment. Method of measurement: Pain illustrated numerical rating scale.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMozhdeh Sepaskhah

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

sepaskhah@sums.ac.ir+98 71 3212 5239

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026