Skip to content

comparing the effect of two different materials on human dental pulp

comparing the effect of ProRoot MTA and MTA/Treated Dentin Matrix (TDM) on clinical and histologic manifestations of human healthy dental pulp

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2013121415782N1
Enrollment
20
Registered
2014-02-16
Start date
2014-01-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Human Pulp Regeneration. Dental drugs, topically applied

Interventions

Intervention 1: intervention: ProRoot MTA/Treated Dentin Matrix in two separate layers of each 1mm thickness, pulpal layer includes TDM and then a layer of MTA covering it, for 6 weeks. Intervention 2
Treatment - Drugs
intervention: ProRoot MTA/Treated Dentin Matrix in two separate layers of each 1mm thickness, pulpal layer includes TDM and then a layer of MTA covering it, for 6 weeks.
control: ProRoot MTA that covering the pulpal exposure in one layer of 2mm thickness

Sponsors

self-sponsored by researchers in study
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 30 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: inclusion criteria: patients between 18 to 30 years old; patients that have at least 3 mature and intact third molars to be extracted; healthy periodontal condition exclusion criteria: systemic diseases; medication intake

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical signs and symptoms (sensitivity to cold test and percussion). Timepoint: 1,3,7,14,21,28,35 and42 days after partial pulpotomy. Method of measurement: pulp vitality tests including thermal tests,Electric pulp test,pain, percussion, palpation,radiography.;Histologic pulp tissue evaluation including inflamation. Timepoint: day 42 after intervention. Method of measurement: light microscopic evaluation.;Histologic pulp tissue evaluation including dentin bridge formation. Timepoint: day 42 after intervention. Method of measurement: light microscopic evaluation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Histologic pulp tissue evaluation including pulp necrosis or abcess formation. Timepoint: after extraction(daye 42). Method of measurement: light microscopic evaluation.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactSohrab Tour Savadkouhi

Tehran Medical science Branch, Islamic Azad University

s_savadkouhi@yahoo.com+98 21 2613 0156

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026