Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of articaine and lidocaine for achieving palatal anesthesia..
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention 1: Intervention group: Participants are randomly assigned to receive articaine anesthesia on one side of the maxilla (left or right) which half a cartridge (equivalent to 0.9 mL) was inj
Sponsors
Esfahan University of Medical Sciences
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: All people who are candidates for implants on both sides of the maxilla
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Age less than 18 years History of trauma or nasal surgery History of psychiatric disorder Congenital anomalies Peripheral neuropathy or presence of sensory deficits in the facial area prior to surgery Uncontrolled systemic conditions
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The amount of change in pain threshold. Timepoint: Before and 5 minutes after injection. Method of measurement: Light Touch (Semmes Weinstein monofilament) test.;The amount of change in sensory threshold. Timepoint: Before and 5 minutes after injection. Method of measurement: Light Touch (Semmes Weinstein monofilament) test. | — |
Countries
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Contacts
Public ContactDr. Milad Etemadi
Esfahan University of Medical Sciences
Outcome results
None listed