Evaluation of lingual mucosa anesthesia due to infiltration of lidocaine compared to articaine in the buccal region of mandible

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20131205015665N7

Enrollment

Registered

2025-08-14

Start date

2025-08-02

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of articaine and lidocaine for achieving lingual anesthesia..

Interventions

Intervention group: Participants will be randomly assigned to receive buccal injections of both articaine and lidocaine anesthetics with a washout period between injections..

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All people who are candidates for implants on both sides of the mandible

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The amount of change in pain threshold. Timepoint: Before and 5 minutes after injection. Method of measurement: Light Touch (Semmes Weinstein monofilament) test.;The amount of change in sensory threshold. Timepoint: Before and 5 minutes after injection. Method of measurement: Light Touch (Semmes Weinstein monofilament) test.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Milad Etemadi

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

etemadi@dnt.mui.ac.ir+98 31 3792 5521

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026