Periosteal block vs. intravenous morphine on reducing the pain of patients with distal forearm fracture

Comparison of the effect of periosteal block vs. intravenous morphine on reducing the pain of patients with distal radius and ulnar fracture

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20131203015640N6

Enrollment

Registered

2018-02-20

Start date

2018-02-15

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with closed distal forearm fracture. Fracture of lower end of both ulna and radius

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: To perform the periosteal block, using a 10cc syringe containing lidocaine 1% at a distance of 6-8 cm proximal to the wrist of the lateral of the radius bone and me

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Closed distal radius and/or ulnar fracture American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 1, 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Open fractures Neurovascular compromise Multiple trauma Head Trauma Suspicion for compartment syndrome Allergy or contraindication for lidocaine or morphine administration

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pain score. Timepoint: Minutes 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 after the intervention. Method of measurement: Visual Analogue Scale.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactAli Abdolrazaghnejad

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

ali.abdorazzagh@gmail.com+98 21 6312 8432

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026