Skip to content

Comparison of two blended teaching and learning process in the course of routine patient education on knowledge, satisfaction and performance of the Undergraduate Nursing ¬ Mandy Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Comparison of two blended teaching and learning process in the course of routine patient education on knowledge, satisfaction and performance of the Undergraduate Nursing ¬ Mandy Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2013100214856N1
Enrollment
304
Registered
2013-11-09
Start date
2013-10-23
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knowledge, satisfaction, performance.

Interventions

Intervention 1: This study is quasi-experimental. To do scholar with the permission of the authorities concerned, the authorities and the introduction of a learning course in college professors who wi
This study is quasi-experimental. To do scholar with the permission of the authorities concerned, the authorities and the introduction of a learning course in college professors who will client and De
Teaching methods in control theory and practical part of lecture and question and answer so that students will be divided into 5 groups of 8-6 (Total students was 36-31) into the And asks them to sele

Sponsors

Deputy of Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: all nursing students during the first semester of the academic education of students who passed duing2012-2013. All patients who were admitted in the hospital during the trial on thses students. Exclusion criteria: student consent to participate in this project from the beginning, or the patient's consent to participate in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Knowledge. Timepoint: Assessment of student knowledge both before and after the intervention is done. Assess student performance in school next semester and is in clinical environments. Method of measurement: The purpose of this study, the scores of militants ¬ nursing knowledge assessment tool, which uses multiple-choice questions designed by the researcher and will be measured with a minimum score of zero and a maximum score of 21.;Satisfaction. Timepoint: Did you mean: ??????? ????????? ????????? ?? ??? ?? ????? ?????? ? ?? ?? ?? ????? ?????? ????? ?? ???. Evaluating students' satisfaction both before and after the intervention, the intervention is done. Method of measurement: In order to study the satisfaction level of education, satisfaction and student learning method is presented which uses the tools to measure the level of satisfaction ¬ take place. Measure the level of satisfaction based on Likert scale of 1 to 5 scale divisions will be completely dissatisfied to 5 very satisfied.;Performance. Timepoint: Assessment of student performance in school next semester and is in clinical environments. Method of measurement: In order to study the performance of the main activities that a graduate nurse should position the patient to perform the operation in the field of education, which can ¬ area of ??education, the interaction of communication and collaboration is. Assessment of student performance in the test and control groups in the second half year 1393-1392 using the scale clinical patient data and caregiver interaction is done. The scale contains 21 such that the patient can function in nursing education describes ¬. To evaluate student performance, each student will have a minimum of a patient survey.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
One of the main roles of professional nursing education. Today's nursing students are coming from, where ¬, ¬ active teaching methods to apply the valuable outcomes such as attitude change and reform, strengthening active participation of learners, creative and dynamic interaction, promote critical thinking, increased confidence reduction of fear and competence in the areas of real anxiety and improve student learning in various areas and will ultimately provide a quality education. Timepoint: Variables are evaluated before and after intervention. Method of measurement: How to measure three variables is described in the previous sectionAfter analyzing the data and draw conclusions about appropriate teaching methods best and most practical way to achieve the desired objectives can be selected.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactNarjes Mohammadpour

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

n.mohammadpour2012@yahoo.com; n.mohammadpour62@yahoo.com+98 21 7715 1648

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026