Comparison of the results of using chromic catgut suture and rapid vicryl suture in women's childbirth

A comparative study of the short-term results of episiotomy repair with Chromic Catgut suture and vicryl rapid suture in women

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20130812014333N239

Enrollment

194

Registered

2025-02-21

Start date

2025-03-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain relief during perineal repair. Complications of anesthesia during labor and delivery

Interventions

Intervention 1: In the first intervention group, episiotomy repair will be performed with chrome suture. All cases will have a right mediolateral episiotomy at a 60-degree angle from the anal sphincte

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Informed consent Primiparous women seeking spontaneous or instrumental deliveries with episiotomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Women with fever during childbirth Cervical rupture Widespread rupture and sphincter rupture Episiotomy extension Severe preeclampsia Severe anemia Previous perineal surgery other than initial repair after birth HIV or hepatitis B infection Dead fetus

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Perineal pain. Timepoint: 24 to 48 hours after treatment. Method of measurement: Questioning the patient.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Tayebeh Noori

Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences

dr.tayebe.noori@gmail.com+98 83 3427 6306

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026