The comparison of anterior colporrhaphy versus transobturator repair in advance cystocele repair

The comparison of anatomical and functional outcomes of anterior colporrhaphy versus transobturator repair in advance cystocele repair

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20130812014333N230

Enrollment

Registered

2024-10-19

Start date

2024-10-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP). Complete uterovaginal prolapse

Interventions

Intervention 1: In the first intervention group (traditional method), after opening the epithelium of the anterior compartment and identifying the pubocervical fascia, we proceed to fold the fascia wi

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Age

18 Years to 80 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age between 18 and 80 years Complaints of cystocele mass Cystocele stage 3 and above Patients who need posterior compartment repair or repair at the same time

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Desire to use a pessary History of prolapse surgery and urinary incontinence Patients needing vaginal hysterectomy Patients with rheumatological history

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Bleeding. Timepoint: 10 days, 2 months and 12 months after the operation. Method of measurement: Seeing the doctor and asking the patient.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Firouze Veisi

Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences

firoozehveisi@yahoo.com+98 83 3427 6306

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026