Skip to content

Comparison of the effect of diaphragmatic breathing and pursed lip breathing on pain control and sleep quality in patients with laparotomy

Comparison of the effect of diaphragmatic breathing and pursed lip breathing on pain control and sleep quality in patients with laparotomy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20130812014333N213
Enrollment
75
Registered
2024-03-06
Start date
2024-03-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparotomy. Laparoscopic surgical procedure converted to open procedure

Interventions

Intervention 1: The first intervention group performed the diaphragmatic breathing technique in a semi-sitting position (while lying on the back in the bed with the shoulders supported by a pillow) at

Sponsors

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
20 Years to 60 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Informed consent Age between 20 and 60 years Patients undergoing laparotomy surgery Ability to speak and understand Persian language Fully alert and aware of time and place

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of lung diseases History of smoking, benzodiazepine and alcohol consumption Chronic exposure to environmental and chemical stimuli History of previous laparotomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intensity of pain. Timepoint: 24, 48 and 72 hours after laparotomy. Method of measurement: The visual analog scale (VAS).;Sleep quality. Timepoint: 24, 48 and 72 hours after laparotomy. Method of measurement: Using hospital sleep quality questionnaire.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactYeganeh Dehghani Najvani

Esfahan University of Medical Sciences

yeganehdehghani@yahoo.com+98 31 3535 4001

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026