Comparison of soft tissue reconstruction between adjacent implants using bone and connective tissue graft in patients missing two adjacent teeth

Comparative evaluation of papilla reconstruction between adjacent implants using bone and connective tissue graft in patients referring to Periodontics Department of Hamadan School of Dentistry

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT2013072414142N1

Enrollment

Registered

2013-08-08

Start date

2013-06-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

missing two adjacent teeth, with bone resorption and papilla loss in the area. Atrophy of edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention 1: FDBA bone block that has been immersed in saline will be used and for adaptation to the area will be trimmed by scissor and fixed in place with titanium screw. Intervention 2: The pala

Treatment - Surgery

FDBA bone block that has been immersed in saline will be used and for adaptation to the area will be trimmed by scissor and fixed in place with titanium screw.

The palatal mucosa between the canine and the mesial line angle of first molar will be used as the source of connective tissue. Connective tissue graft harvested from the palate by making a single i

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Age

25 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: missing two adjacent tooth so that there is the possibility of placing two implants in bone site; the area is edentulous for at least 3 months Exclusion criteria: periodontal plastic surgery or Bone graft history in the area; presence of any systemic disease (Including uncontrolled diabetes, osteomyelitis) that may affect implant placement or soft tissue management; smoking; Pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Papilla height based on papilla index. Timepoint: 3 months after intervention,6 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Qualitative determination of vertical distance between the tip of papilla to the line connecting Zenith of soft tissue margin at adjacent crowns based on grading system of Papilla index (Jemt).This index is classified into five grades (0,1,2,3,4) .	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Distance from the tip of the papilla to the alveolar crest. Timepoint: 3 months after intervention,6 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Quantitative measurement of vertical distance from the tip of papilla between two implants to the alveolar crest in periapical radiography using radiopaque indicator in millimeters.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Syed Reza Arabi

Hamadan University of Medical Sciences

sr_arabi@yahoo.com+98 81 1838 1086

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026