Skip to content

Two antimicrobial solution and Betadine Sylvspt

The comparison of the antiseptic effects of silocept and povidine iodon on surgical scrub.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2013060312701N4
Enrollment
60
Registered
2013-06-12
Start date
2013-05-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention 1: Group B = scrub with a solution of iodine in 33 different days during the first surgery of the day. Intervention 2: Group A = scrub the spray silo Sep 29 different days during the firs
Prevention
Group B = scrub with a solution of iodine in 33 different days during the first surgery of the day
Group A = scrub the spray silo Sep 29 different days during the first surgery of the day

Sponsors

Semnan University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: In an experimental study, selected participants from surgical team members of Amir Hospital in Semnan were participated to scrub their hands with SilvoSept and povidone iodine, in two separate times. Dominant hand was sampled 3 times to get microbial cultures: before scrubbing, after drying, and after an hour. Participants were asked about each solution's utilities.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cultivation reply. Timepoint: Before, immediately after and 1 h after washing hands. Method of measurement: Sampling and Microbial Cultivation.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactForozeshfard Mohammad

Semnan University of Medical Sciences

mff@sem-ums.ac.ir+98 23 1446 0099

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026