Comparison of performing and not performing the prophylactic surgery for urinary incontinence in advanced pelvic organ prolapse

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT2013041513025N1

Enrollment

Registered

2013-06-15

Start date

2012-06-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic organ prolapse. Female genital prolapse

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: 30 patients undergo urinary incontinence surgery in addition to prolapse surgery (Standard surgery+ TOT). Intervention 2: Control group: 30 patients undergo urinary

Treatment - Surgery

Intervention group: 30 patients undergo urinary incontinence surgery in addition to prolapse surgery (Standard surgery+ TOT).

Control group: 30 patients undergo urinary incontinence surgery without prolapse surgery (Standard surgery).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Women with advanced vaginal prolapse without urinary incontinence symptoms. Exclusion criteria: Women with advanced vaginal prolapse with urinary incontinence symptoms; Women who are not candidate for surgery due to comorbidities.(cardiac, pulmonary, etc)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Development of SUI after surgery. Timepoint: Before intervention, 1 month after intervention and 2 months after intervention. Method of measurement: Standard questionnaire ICIQ-SF.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactDr Parvin Bastani

Tabriz university of medical science

bastanip@tbzmed.ac.ir+98 41 1443 5590

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026