effect of dysport in addition to surgery of incontinence

Combination of midurethral sling vs low-dose dysport injection in comparison with midurethral sling alone in mixed incontinence

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

IRCT

Registry ID

IRCT20130306012728N7

Enrollment

Registered

2020-03-01

Start date

2020-01-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

mixed Urinary incontinence. Mixed incontinence

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group: undergo sling surgery with simultaneous injection of 500 units of Dysport. Intervention 2: Control group: undergo sling surgery alone.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Age

15 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: mixed urinary incontinence with no response to drugs Patients with VLPP+ + D.O?Cough induced D.O + Leakage ? Capacity normal or average in urodynamic study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: urethral hyper mobility severe prolapse neurological diseases (CVA,MS,..) previous abdominal surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Urinary incontinence complaints are one of the most common urological complaints, especially among women, with a prevalence of around 12-17%. Timepoint: Patients will be evaluated and evaluated for response to treatment at 1 and 3 months after surgery. Method of measurement: The treatment response assessment method will be based on ICIQ and ICIQ-OAB questionnaires.	—

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactHooshang Shamsi Sisi

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences

h.shamsimd@gmail.com+98 41 3334 7054

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026