Skip to content

Comparing the cost-effectiveness of two alternative bypassing agents (aryoseven & feiba )for haemophilia

Comparing the cost-effectiveness of two alternative bypassing agents (aryoseven & feiba) for patients with hemophilia A complicated by an inhibitor in Iran

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2013020612380N1
Enrollment
30
Registered
2013-05-07
Start date
2013-02-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Haemophilia. Hereditary factor VIII deficiency

Interventions

Intervention 1: Intervention group1: patients based on the belief treatment & based on previous history (questionnaire available) are divided into consumer Aryo (Group A), two bleeding event in ea
Treatment - Drugs
Intervention group1: patients based on the belief treatment & based on previous history (questionnaire available) are divided into consumer Aryo (Group A), two bleeding event in each category wi
Intervention group 2: Patient care based on the belief & treatment history (according to the questionnaire) will be divided into consumer Faiba (Group F): 2 bleeding event in each category will be d
Control group: because of consistency of study the patients are divided into control group(O) Indifferent or new

Sponsors

Aryogen biopharma co.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: patients with severe hemophilia a with high inhibitor titers (greater than or equal to 5 Bethesda) in pilot studies to assess the attitude of coagulation shortcuts are classified. Exclusion criteria: patients who have previously unclassified; patients with coagulation problems, developed liver problems; patients who received coagulation products is over 5 days ago and patients who have bleeding arthritis in the joint within 7 days ago.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 hours after intervention. Method of measurement: Measure kavakli.;Range of motion. Timepoint: 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 hours after intervention. Method of measurement: Measure kavakli.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Bleeding control. Timepoint: 24 hours. Method of measurement: Evaluation of treatment success.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMina Golestani

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

mgolestani8958@gmail.com+98 41 1336 6290

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026