Skip to content

comparision between two methods of circumcision

A comparative study of suturless circumcision and conventional circumcision with suture

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT2013020512368N1
Enrollment
100
Registered
2013-06-18
Start date
2011-03-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Circumcision. Routine and ritual circumcision

Interventions

Intervention 1: In circumcision surgery without sutures, the string is not used to repair. Intervention 2: In conventional surgical technique, Absorbable suture to approximate the foreskin and mucosal
Treatment - Surgery
In circumcision surgery without sutures, the string is not used to repair.
In conventional surgical technique, Absorbable suture to approximate the foreskin and mucosal cuff is used.

Sponsors

Vice Chancellor for research, Kermanshah University of Meical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male
Age
No minimum to 12 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: Children referred for circumcision to Imam Reza Hospital. Exclusion criteria: Children whose parents did not consent to circumcision procedure without suture.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Bleeding. Timepoint: One week and one month after surgery. Method of measurement: Surgeon diagnosis.;Infection. Timepoint: One week and one month after surgery. Method of measurement: Surgeon diagnosis.;Inflamation. Timepoint: One week and one month after surgery. Method of measurement: Surgeon diagnosis.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactArdalan Solimani

Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences

ardalansolimani@yahoo.com+98 83 1427 6311

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026