Skip to content

Comparison between the different corrective exercises along with Diet on improvement of Low Back Pain Patients

Comparison between the different type of corrective exercises along with Diet on Anterior Pelvic Tilt in obesity Impacting Low Back Pain Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
IRCT
Registry ID
IRCT20130121012210N10
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-03-14
Start date
2023-03-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

low back pain. Contusion of lower back and pelvis

Interventions

Intervention 1: Control group: The participants would be assessed by a nutritionist and their basal metabolic rate (BMR) would be calculated and finally Recommended Caloric Requirement (RCR) calculat

Sponsors

Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
25 Years to 40 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Subjects with NSLBP Age between 25 to 40years Anterior pelvic tilt more than 13.5 degree Grade I and II obesity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ?Dermatological or inflammatory illness Recent fractures Congenital lower extremity abnormalities Cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal and hematological disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain. Timepoint: before treatment, at the end of treatment (after the 6th week). Method of measurement: according to the Visual analog scale.;Disability. Timepoint: before treatment, at the end of treatment (after the 6th week). Method of measurement: Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire.;Quality of life. Timepoint: before treatment, at the end of treatment (after the 6th week). Method of measurement: SF-36 questionnaire.;Pelvic Tilt. Timepoint: before treatment, at the end of treatment (after the 6th week). Method of measurement: photogrammetry.;Body composition. Timepoint: before treatment, at the end of treatment (after the 6th week). Method of measurement: Bioelectrical impedance analysis.;Muscle strength. Timepoint: before treatment, at the end of treatment (after the 6th week). Method of measurement: Dynamometer.;Muscle thickness. Timepoint: before treatment, at the end of treatment (after the 6th week). Method of measurement: Ultrasounography.;Aerobic Fitness. Timepoint: before treatment, at the end of treatment (after the 6th week). Method of measurement: Bruce Protocol.;Waist-Hip Ratio. Timepoint: before treatment, at the end of treatment (after the 6th week). Method of measurement: circumference of the waist to that of the hips by tape.;Muscle length. Timepoint: before treatment, at the end of treatment (after the 6th week). Method of measurement: Thomas Test.

Countries

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Contacts

Public ContactMuhammad Sarfraz

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

mohdpk23@hotmail.com+98 21 7752 8468

Outcome results

None listed

Source: IRCT (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026